DOI: https://doi.org/10.24061/202568

Порівняльна характеристика синтаксичної сполучуваності прикметників з іменниками в художньому, публіцистичному та науковому стилях сучасної англійської мови

Oksana Danylovych

Анотація


Мета статті - порівняльна характеристика сполучуваності прикметників з іменниками в художньому, публіцистичному і науковому стилях. Актуальність даного дослідження обумовлена необхідністю порівняння синтаксичної сполучуваності в трьох стилях. У дослідженні використаний статистичний метод, який показує наявність або відсутність зв'язку. Коефіцієнт К вказує на силу (інтенсивність) зв'язків. Виділення стандартних зв'язків для прикметників дало можливість встановити особливості функціонування прикметників в кожному стилі, що є науковою новизною роботи. Висновки. Художній стиль відрізняється кількістю статистично значущих зв'язків, так і зв'язками, які характерні тільки для художнього стилю. Науковий стиль займає проміжне місце між художнім і публіцистичним. Кількість однакових статистично значущих зв'язків виявлено більше між публіцистичним і художнім (9) в порівнянні з науковим і художнім (5) і публіцистичним і науковим (2)

Ключові слова


сполучуваність; прикметник; іменник; лексико-семантична група; синтагматичні зв'язки; функціональний стиль

Повний текст:

PDF

Посилання


Baroni M., Lenci A. “How we BLESSed distributional semantic evaluation”, Proceedings of the GEMS, Workshop on Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, 2011, P. 1–10 [in English].

Danylovych O. D. “Intensyvnist’ spoluchuvanosti prykmetnykiv z leksyko-semantychnymy grupamy imennykiv u naukovomu styli suchasnoi anglijs’koi movy” [The intensity of combinability of adjectives with lexical-semantic groups of nouns in the scientific style of the modern English language], Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia “Filolohichna” [Scientific notes of National university “Ostroh Academy”. Philological Series], Ostrog: Vyd. NU “Ostroz’ka Academia, 2014, Vol. 43, P. 84–87 [in Ukrainian].

Danylovych O. D. “Kil’kisni parametry spoluchuvanosti prykmetnykiv z imennykamy v angliys’kiy presi” [Quantitative parameters of combinability of adjectives with nouns in English press], Naukovyi visnyk [Scientific Journal] Chernivtsi: Ruta, 2004, Vol. 206–207: Germans’ka filologia, P. 98–112 [in Ukrainian].

Danylovych O. D. “Spoluchuvanist’ okremykh prykmetnykiv z pidklasamy imennykiv u publitsystychnomu styli” [Combinability of some adjectives with subclasses of nouns in the publicistic style], Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia “Filolohichna” [Scientific notes of National university “Ostroh Academy”. Philological Series], Ostrog: Vyd. NU “Ostroz’ka Academia, 2007, Vol. 8, P. 140–149 [in Ukrainian].

Fei Sun, Jiafeng Guo Yanyan, Lan Jun, Xu & Xueqi Cheng. “LearningWord Representations by Jointly Modeling Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Relations”, Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing Beijing, China, Association for Computational Linguistics, July 26-31, 2015, P. 136–145 [in English].

Hjorland B. “Are relations in thesauri “context‐free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, Vol. 66, N 7, P. 1367-1373 [in English].

Krenn B. Distributional and Linguistic Implications of Collocation Identification. Proc. Collocations Workshop, DGfS Conference, Marburg, 2000, Proc. Collocations, Vol. I, P. 241-246 [in English].

Levitskiy V. V. Semasiologia [Semasiology], Vynnytsya: Nova knyga, 2006, P.191 [in Russian].

Levitskiy V. V. Statisticheskoye izucheniye leksicheskoy semantiki [Statistical study of lexical semantics], Kyiv: UMK VO, 1989, P. 28, 31, 32, 37 [in Russian].

Morkovkin V. V. “Sochetaemostnyie svotstva slova i problema ikh sistemnoy leksikograficheskoy interpretatsii” [Combinatory properties of the word and problem of their systematic lexicographic interpretation], Problemy sochetaemosti slov: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov MGPIIYA im M. Toresan [The Problems of words combinatory: a collection of scientific works of MGPIIYA named after M. Toresan], Moskva, 1979, Vol. 145, P. 130-132 [in Russian].

Peters I. & Weller K. “Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organisation system”, Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press. Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 2008, IWP 59 (2), P. 100–107 [in English].

Rapp R. “The computation of word associations: Comparing syntagmatic and paradigmatic approaches”, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2002, Vol. 1, P. 1–7 [in English].

Rubenstein H. & Goodenough J. Contextual correlates of synonymy. Communications of the ACM, 1965, 8 (10), P. 627-633 [in English].

Sahlgren M. “The distributional hypothesis”, Italian Journal of linguistics, 2008, Vol. 20, N 1, P. 33–54 [in English].

Sahlgren M. “The word-space model: Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in highdimensional vector spaces”, PhD Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University, 2006, 156 p. [in English].

Schütze H. & Pedersen J. “A vector model for syntagmatic and paradigmatic relatedness. Making sense of words”, Proceedings of the Conference England, Oxford, 1993, P. 104-113 [in English].

Schütze H. & Pedersen, J. “Information retrieval based on word senses”, Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, 1995, P. 161–175 [in English].

Wanying Chiu K. “Paradigmatic relations and syntagmatic relations: how are they related?”, Article No. 122 St. Louis, Missouri — November 06 - 10, American Society for Information Science Silver, Springs. Vol. 63, N 5, P. 923-935 [in English].


Пристатейна бібліографія ГОСТ


1 Morkovkin V.V. ―Sochetaemostnyie svotstva slova i problema ikh sistemnoy leksikograficheskoy interpretatsii‖ [Combinatory properties of the word and problem of their systematic lexicographic interpretation], Problemy sochetaemosti slov: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov MGPIIYA im M. Toresan [The Problems of words combinatory: a collection of scientific works of MGPIIYA named after M. Toresan], Moscow, 1979, Vol. 145, P. 130–132 [in Russian].


2 Sahlgren M. ―The distributional hypothesis‖, Italian Journal of linguistics, 2008, Vol. 20, N 1, P. 33–54 [in English].


3 Schütze H. & Pedersen, J. ―Information retrieval based on word senses‖, Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, 1995, P. 161–175 [in English].


4 Rubenstein H. & Goodenough J. Contextual correlates of synonymy. Communications of the ACM, 1965, 8 (10), P. 627-633 [in English].


5 Krenn B. Distributional and Linguistic Implications of Collocation Identification. Proc. Collocations Workshop, DGfS Conference, Marburg, 2000, Proc. Collocations, Vol. I, P. 241–246 [in English].


6 Sahlgren M. The distributional hypothesis, Italian Journal of linguistics, 2008, N 20(1), P. 33–54 [in English].


7 Fei Sun, Jiafeng Guo Yanyan, Lan Jun, Xu & Xueqi Cheng. ―LearningWord Representations by Jointly Modeling Syntagmatic and Paradig-matic Relations‖, Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Con-ference on Natural Language Processing Beijing, China, Association for Computational Linguistics, July 26-31, 2015, P. 136–145 [in English].


8 Baroni M., Lenci A. ―How we BLESSed distributional semantic evaluation‖, Proceedings of the GEMS, Workshop on Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, 2011, P. 1–10 [in English].

9 Rapp R. ―The computation of word associations: Comparing syntagmatic and paradigmatic approaches‖, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2002, Vol. 1, P. 1–7 [in English].


10 Sahlgren M. ―The word-space model: Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in highdi-mensional vector spaces‖, PhD Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University, 2006, 156 p. [in English].


11 Peters I. & Weller K. ―Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organisation system‖, Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press. Information- Wissenschaft & Praxis, 2008, IWP 59 (2), P. 100–107 [in English].


12 Schütze H. & Pedersen J. ―A vector model for syntagmatic and paradigmatic relatedness. Making sense of words‖, Proceedings of the Confer-ence England, Oxford, 1993, P. 104–113 [in English].


13 Wanying Chiu K. ―Paradigmatic relations and syntagmatic relations: how are they related?‖, Article No. 122 St. Louis, Missouri — November 06 - 10, American Society for Information Science Silver, Springs. Vol.63, №5, P. 923–935 [in English].


14 Hjorland B. ―Are relations in thesauri ―context‐free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds, Journal of the Association for Information Sci-ence and Technology, 2015, Vol. 66, N 7, P. 1367–1373. [in English].


15 Danylovych O. D. ―Spoluchuvanist’ okremykh prykmetnykiv z pidklasamy imennykiv u publitsystychnomu styli‖ [Combinability of some ad-jectives with subclasses of nouns in the publicistic style], Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia “Filolohichna” [Scientific notes of National university ―Ostroh Academy‖. Philological Series], Ostrog: Vyd. NU ―Ostroz’ka Academia, 2007, Vol. 8, P. 140–149 [in Ukrainian].


16 Danylovych O. D. ―Intensyvnist’ spoluchuvanosti prykmetnykiv z leksyko-semantychnymy grupamy imennykiv u naukovomu styli suchasnoi anglijs’koi movy‖ [The intensity of combinability of adjectives with lexical-semantic groups of nouns in the scientific style of the modern English language], Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia “Filolohichna” [Scientific notes of National university ―Ostroh Academy‖. Philological Series], Ostrog: Vyd. NU ―Ostroz’ka Academia, 2014, Vol. 43, P. 84–87 [in Ukrainian].


17 Levitskiy V.V. Statisticheskoye izucheniye leksicheskoy semantiki [Statistical study of lexical semantics], Kyiv: UMK VO, 1989, P. 37 [in Rus-sian].


18 Danylovych O. D. ―Kil’kisni parametry spoluchuvanosti prykmetnykiv z imennykamy v angliys’kiy presi‖ [Quantitative parameters of combina-bility of adjectives with nouns in English press], Naukovyi visnyk [Scientific Journal] Chernivtsi: Ruta, 2004, Vol. 206–207: Germans’ka filologia, P. 98–112 [in Ukrainian].


19 Levitskiy V.V. Semasiologia [Semasiology], Vynnytsya: Nova knyga, 2006, P. 191 [in Russian].


20 Levitskiy V.V. Statisticheskoye izucheniye…..., op. cit., P. 28.


21 Ibidem, P. 31.


22 Ibidem, P. 31–32.





Copyright (c) 2020 Актуальні питання суспільних наук та історії медицини

Creative Commons License
Ця робота ліцензована Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2311-9896 (Print), ISSN: 2411-6181 (Online).